Showing posts with label predictions. Show all posts
Showing posts with label predictions. Show all posts

Saturday, January 8, 2011

Pre-season predictions: how have I done?

New readers, please read the basics before leaving any comments.


Well, it's the first week of the new year, and I'm reading a book I received as a Christmas gift (thanks Mom and Dad) called Future Babble, which is written by Ottawa Citizen columnist Dan Gardner, who has also written the excellent Risk: The Science and Politics of Fear. The gist of Future Babble is that people suck at making predictions. For instance, in his latest article, Gardner says:
People want to hear predictions. And for the expert, there's no way he can lose. If the prediction hits, he can boast about it and reporters will cite it as proof of his wisdom. But if it misses, no one will ever hear about it again.
Heads, I win. Tails, you forget we had a bet.
Of course the rules of the game would be a little different if, at the end of the year, instead of asking for new predictions, we looked back at what was predicted to happen in the year ending. Think of it as holding people to account for the predictions they make.
While admittedly I don't consider myself an "expert" and I've previously noted the difficulty of predicting the outcome of the NBA season before the season starts, I did make some predictions that we could examine. I'd  like to be accountable and trustworthy, and I'd like to learn from my mistakes, so let's start out with my predicted NBA standings - how have I done so far (full spreadsheet here)? All win totals are accurate as of January 5, 2011.



Included in the table are several columns - predicted wins (what I predicted before the start of the season), current record, a simple win projection (which multiplies current winning percentage across 82 games), a point differential win projection (which uses Arturo's formula to determine wins via point differential), and the average difference between my pre-season predictions and the two projection methods.

What does the table show? Generally, I was either really close or way off - not much in between. Thirteen of my predictions came within 5 wins of the current projections, 12 predictions were off by ten or more wins, and only five predictions were off in the 5-10 win range. The teams I overrated the most: Sacramento (a whopping 22.4 wins off target), Cleveland (21.3 wins off), Portland (18.3 wins off), Golden State and Philadelphia (each 17.1 wins off), and New Jersey (16.3 wins off). The teams I nailed: Orlando (0.4 wins off), Chicago (0.6 wins off), the Lakers (1.0 wins off), and (of course) Toronto (1.1 wins off). Where did I go wrong with those six teams?

Sacramento



Carl Landry has fallen into the toilet and can't get out, Dalembert isn't playing up to his usual standards, and I was burned by one rookie (Cousins) and one second-year player (Evans). As we saw with Kevin Durant, sometimes the rookies that we think are going to be good NBA players start out slowly, so either of these two players could turn it around in the future. Of course, some players never get it - we've been saying the same thing about Michael Beasley, who is still not playing well during his third season.

A few players - led by Udrih, Casspi, Garcia, and Head - have out-performed my expectations, but if you combine the bonus wins provided by every player in the green (6.6 wins) it is barely enough to make up for Evans or Landry by themselves.

Cleveland



J.J. Hickson has, to paraphrase Jason Kidd, performed a complete 360 this season. Last year Hickson was just a shade below an average player, and this year he is giving the lovable Andrea Bargnani a run for his money in the competition to win the Darius Songaila award. Hickson is only 22 years old, so his volatility is somewhat understandable...but you can't blame me for not forseeing such a huge change. Antawn Jamison is finally starting to show his age - you could argue I should have seen a decline coming there. Mo Williams is also down this year - his shooting efficiency (which is supposed to be his strong point) is way down and his turnovers are up, but thankfully he's been able to up his assists. Other than that, the other players who haven't met my expectations have only been slightly below what I had penciled them in for; however, all those small changes add up quickly.

Andersen Varejao is really the only player on the team who has stepped up his play this season. It seems that the turmoil associated with LeBron's departure has really messed with the players who stuck around - probably one part new roles and one part psychological.

Portland



The big letdown here is Brandon Roy - I expected him to account for 10.8 wins on the season, and right now he is not even on pace to win a single game. And even though I only allocated 800 minutes to Oden, his rate of production is so good that I expected him to account for 4.7 wins. Well, there's about 16 wins out the window. Joel Przybilla is also on pace to be down about 5 wins, but, as he returns from injury, his minutes will go up and so will his projected wins. The rest of the players who have let me down have combined to produce 10.4 wins fewer than I expected.

On the plus side, the two old guys (Miller and Camby) have upped their games, as has Batum and Mathews. These four players have combined to exceeded my expectations by 10.7 wins. It's a testament to the Blazers that they've been able to stick around 0.500 with injuries to some of their top players.

Golden State



The big problem with my Warriors prediction has been the play of David Lee. After receiving an early Christmas present from Wilson Chandler, Lee had a serious infection in his shooting arm and hasn't played well since. The other players that are hurting my prediction are Stephen Curry, Reggie Williams, and Louis Amundson - all players with limited playing histories.

On the plus side, human sine wave Monta Ellis is playing better than I expected...for now.

Philadelphia



The Sixers are the only one of these teams to be off in a positive direction - I predicted they would win around 19 games, but right now they're on pace for 39 wins. The big differences are due to the return of Elton Brand (finally) and Andres Nocioni, the emergence of two young players (Jrue Holiday and Thaddeus Young) as average to above-average players, and a lower than expected amount of minutes being allocated to unproductive players (perhaps coach Doug Collins is actually helping the team in this case?).

While he has been slightly better than I expected, Iguodala's minutes have been low due to injuries. Rookie Evan Turner hasn't lived up to expectations so far, and Louis Williams has offered less than he has in the past. Still, things are much rosier in Philadelphia than I thought they would be.

New Jersey



Brook Lopez is another young player who seems to have taken a huge step backwards, as has old WP favourite Troy Murphy.  Additionally, Outlaw and Terence Williams aren't playing the way I thought they would.

On the bright side, ex-Raptor Kris Humphries has improved drastically, nearly making up for Murphy's poor performance on his own (he's also the star of my Wins Score Association fantasy team). New Jersey should also get a little better as Vujacic gets a larger percentage of the team's playing time.


Once the season finishes, I'll take another look back and see if anything's change significantly. Hopefully things regress back to my expectations!

 - Devin

Wednesday, November 3, 2010

Arturo keeps us honest

For you new readers out there, make sure you know about the basics before you leave a silly anonymous comment. 


Arturo Galletti - polymath and genius extraordinaire - has been keeping track of how accurate the predictions of the Wages of Wins Network Smackdown participants are, as well as those of some other, more prominent analysts (such as a certain ESPN stats "guru").

Go take a look! Right now, I'm in fourth place!

Do I get a medal yet? Or maybe a job with ESPN?


 - Devin

Thursday, October 28, 2010

Updates: Season and Team Projections

This article uses the Wins Produced metric to discuss the productivity of NBA players. This metric is based on box score statistics that are adjusted for other factors including pace, position and team. A general scale is given for these, and links to advanced explanations are listed at the bottom of the page.

Wins Produced per 48 Minutes (WP48) – The number of wins a player produces in 48 minutes of play. 0.100 is average and 0.250 is considered the “superstar threshold”. A player a WP48 of 0.000 produces no wins, and any player with a negative WP48 produces a negative number a wins (or, if you prefer, a positive number of losses)


For more information on the terms used in this post, please consult the Glossary of Terms.


I have made a few slight changes to both the season predictions and the Raptors prediction; in the case of the Raptors, it looks like Jay Triano is going to play Reggie Evans as much as he did in the preseason, and, due to his struggles, Calderon will be playing less. I adjusted the numbers accordingly and the Raptors improve by...less than one win (although it rounds up). With my season numbers, I knocked off 8 wins to make sure all the league wins added up to 1230. Previously, I was happy with close enough, but...might as well make it more realistic. While all of the previous wins were calculated using the numbers, this knocking off business was done rather subjectively. So here are the last numbers:


Eastern Conference:

  1. Miami Heat (65-17)
  2. Chicago Bulls (55-27)
  3. Orlando Magic (54-28)
  4. Boston Celtics (53-29)
  5. Atlanta Hawks (46-36) 
  6. Milwaukee Bucks (44-38)
  7. New Jersey Nets (41-41)
  8. Cleveland Cavaliers (39-43)
  9. New York Knicks (38-44)
  10. Charlotte Bobcats (33-49)
  11. Detroit Pistons (29-53)
  12. Toronto Raptors (28-54)
  13. Indiana Pacers (26-56)
  14. Philadelphia 76ers (19-63)
  15. Washington Wizards (10-72)

Western Conference:
  1. Portland Trailblazers (61-21)
  2. San Antonio Spurs (58-24)
  3. Los Angeles Lakers (56-26)
  4. Golden State Warriors (48-34)
  5. Dallas Mavericks (47-35)
  6. Denver Nuggets (45-37)
  7. Oklahoma City Thunder (44-38)
  8. Phoenix Suns (44-38)
  9. Sacramento Kings (43-39)
  10. New Orleans Hornets (43-39)
  11. Houston Rockets (42-40)
  12. Utah Jazz (42-40)
  13. Memphis Grizzlies (29-53)
  14. Minnesota Timberwolves (26-56)
  15. Los Angeles Clippers (22-60)

The spreadsheet with the updated projections for the Raptors has been automatically updated, but I'll repost it:




In addition to continuing the front office audit, I'll be doing weekly posts on the Raptors' performance during the season using Andres' automated wins produced numbers.

 - Devin

Monday, October 25, 2010

Updated 2010-11 Team Projection

This article uses the Wins Produced metric to discuss the productivity of NBA players. This metric is based on box score statistics that are adjusted for other factors including pace, position and team. A general scale is given for these, and links to advanced explanations are listed at the bottom of the page.

Wins Produced per 48 Minutes (WP48) – The number of wins a player produces in 48 minutes of play. 0.100 is average and 0.250 is considered the “superstar threshold”. A player a WP48 of 0.000 produces no wins, and any player with a negative WP48 produces a negative number a wins (or, if you prefer, a positive number of losses)


For more information on the terms used in this post, please consult the Glossary of Terms.


It has come to my attention that some readers are still looking at the projection I made several months ago and believe that is current. That is not the case.

The Raptors - as currently constructed - are going to fare a bit worse this season. Although I have revealed my predicted win totals a couple of times in the past week or so, I haven't posted a detailed account. So here it is, the updated team numbers for the coming season:



So the Raptors - barring significant trades or injuries - stand to win around 27 games this season. Unless, of course, some Raptors play like they did during the preseason. But previous seasons are a better predictor of player productivity than preseason numbers, so the above spreadsheet is a more reliable prediction than anything based on preseason numbers.

Some factors that might affect these predictions:
  • Based on last year's numbers, I have Reggie Evans down for only 762 minutes. If Evans gets more playing time this year (and it looks like he might), the Raptors will win more games
  • Calderon has a projected WP48 of about 0.180. If he continues to struggle like last year (and this preseason), the Raptors will lose more games
  • Barbosa might have a better WP48 this season (then again, he might not). His production has been rather unstable over his career, and the Raptors win totals could decrease by as many as 2 wins or increase by as many as 3 wins depending on his production.
All in all, 27 wins seems like a pretty good projection. For more WoW based season predictions, head on over to the Wages of Wins Network 2011 Super Stat Geek Smackdown.

 - Devin.

Saturday, October 23, 2010

2010-2011 Season Predictions

Rob O'Malley of Roblog decided that the writers of the Wages of Wins network should all participate in a contest to see who is the best at predicting the outcome of the 2010-2011 NBA season. Andres took the ball and created a web page that will keep everyone's predictions in a public place. Here are my picks (unless rosters change significantly in the next couple of days):


Eastern Conference:
  1. Miami Heat (68-14)
  2. Chicago Bulls (56-26)
  3. Orlando Magic (54-28)
  4. Boston Celtics (53-29)
  5. Atlanta Hawks (46-36) 
  6. Milwaukee Bucks (44-30)
  7. New Jersey Nets (43-39)
  8. Cleveland Cavaliers (39-43)
  9. New York Knicks (38-44)
  10. Charlotte Bobcats (33-49)
  11. Detroit Pistons (29-53)
  12. Toronto Raptors (27-55)
  13. Indiana Pacers (27-55)
  14. Philadelphia 76ers (19-63)
  15. Washington Wizards (10-72)
  16.  
    Surprise teams? In the East, there was only one team that really surprised me: Philadelphia. Unfortunately for Philly fans, the 76ers are a one-man team with no supporting cast. Andre Iguodala (13), Louis Williams (4), and Evan Turner (4) are probably going to produce around 21 wins by themselves. Everyone else? About -2 wins.

    Many of the other Wages of Wins Network writers have already mentioned how good the Bulls, the Nets, and the Cavs are likely to be, so these teams didn't surprise me (but might surprise casual fans).

    If the seeding ends up like this, we'll get to see a Heat-Cavs matchup in the first round (fun!), as the Cavs would make the 8th seed despite being under .500.


    Western Conference:
    1. Portland Trailblazers (62-20)
    2. San Antonio Spurs (59-23)
    3. Los Angeles Lakers (56-26)
    4. Golden State Warriors (48-34)
    5. Dallas Mavericks (47-35)
    6. Denver Nuggets (45-37)
    7. Oklahoma City Thunder (44-38)
    8. Phoenix Suns (44-38)
    9. Sacramento Kings (43-39)
    10. New Orleans Hornets (43-39)
    11. Houston Rockets (42-40)
    12. Utah Jazz (42-40)
    13. Memphis Grizzlies (29-53)
    14. Minnesota Timberwolves (26-56)
    15. Los Angeles Clippers (22-60)

      Surprise teams? Portland, Golden State, and the Kings are going to be good, but a lot of other WoWN writers have already pointed them out. To me, the Spurs remaining so good was news, as was the crapitude of the Grizzlies. With Krstic and Green hurting their team, I don't see the Thunder doing as well as last year.

      Some fun playoff matchups in the West would be: a Portland-Suns rematch, a "youth" vs "experience" matchup in Spurs-Thunder, and a hopefully interesting renewal of the Mavs-Warriors rivalry. Interesting that of the 15 Western Conference teams, I have 12 finishing above .500. This year (barring injuries and trades...which, come on, almost never happen) there will be a logjam in the West.


      NBA Playoffs:
      • Eastern Conference Finalists: Miami Heat, Chicago Bulls
      • Western Conference Finalists: Portland Trailblazers, Los Angeles Lakers
      • NBA Champions: Miami Heat

      Media Awards:

      MVP:
      1. Kevin Durant
      2. Dwight Howard
      3. Lebron James

      Rookie of the Year:
      1. Blake Griffin
      2. DeMarcus Cousins
      3. John Wall

      Defensive Player of the Year:
      1. Dwight Howard
      2. Rajon Rondo
      3. Thabo Sefolosha

      6th Man Award:
      1. Udonis Haslem
      2. Reggie Williams
      3. Matt Barnes

      Most Improved Player:
      1. Kevin Love
      2. DeJuan Blair
      3. Stephen Curry

      Coach of the Year:
      1. Tom Thibideau (Bulls)
      2. Keith Smart (Warriors)
      3. Paul Westphal (Kings)

      Executive of the Year:
      1. Pat Riley (Miami)
      2. Larry Riley (Golden State)
      3. Billy King (New Jersey)

      Wins Produced Awards:

      MVP:
      1. Lebron James
      2. Dwight Howard
      3. Kevin Durant

      Rookie of the Year:
      1. Blake Griffin
      2. DeMarcus Cousins
      3. Ed Davis

      Sixth Man Award:
      1. Lamar Odom
      2. Chris Andersen
      3. DeJuan Blair

      Most Improved Player:
      1. Kevin Love
      2. DeJuan Blair
      3. Chris Paul


      At the end of the regular season, I'll be able to look back and see what I missed (which I'm sure will be plenty). Regardless of how I fare, one thing's for sure: my predictions are going to be a lot better than my ESPN fantasy team (never miss the start of a draft, because the computer will pick for you; I'm stuck with Kobe, Carmelo, Aaron Brooks, Joe Johnson, and Danny Granger in a Win Score league).

       - Devin.

        Tuesday, October 12, 2010

        NBA GMs: Making the best decisions given limited information

        Andres over at Nerdnumbers has his weekly podcast up - go check it out.
        Done yet (and don't say no)? Good.

        In the podcast, Arturo comes right out and says that NBA GMs are stupid. Then Andres reminds him that if he wants to do stat work in the NBA, he should be more friendly to GMs, and so Arturo amends his statement: "NBA GMs make the best decisions given their limited information." What led to this discussion? The annual NBA GM Survey. My favourite one - when it comes to the Raptors, because there's a lot of crazy stuff in there - is the following prediction:

        Which team will be most improved in 2010-11?
        1. Miami - 39.3%
        2. New York - 14.3%
        3. Washington - 14.3%
        4. Clippers - 10.7%
        5. New Jersey - 10.7%
        6. Philadelphia - 7.1%
        7. Toronto - 3.6%

        That means that at least one out of the 30 NBA GMs (and the percentage actually works out to 1/28, so two GMs didn't vote, or something weird happened) thinks that the Raptors are going to improve on last year's 40-42 record to such a degree that they improve more than any team in the league. Now, at the start of the summer (before free agency) things looked much more optimistic than they do now; when Matt Barnes was going to sign with the team, things looked a lot better; before Ed Davis injured himself playing pickup ball in Mississauga, things looked better. But right now, things don't look good for the Raptors. And you, Mr. Anonymous NBA GM, are telling me that not only are the Raptors going improve on last year's record, but that the Raptors will actually improve more than any other team in the league? More than Miami? How did you get your job again?

        Previously, my prediction for the Raptors was around 35 wins, but I was being optimistic and it was done using a rather simplistic method. Pretty soon I will post my more complicated win predictions for all teams, predict all the award winners, and take a pre-season stab at who will win the Championship. But for right now, I will leave you with the following number:

        28

        (Gold star if you can guess its significance)

         - Devin.