New readers, please check out the basics before leaving any comments.
Now that the season is official over for the Raptors, it's a good time to review how the season went.
Team Overview:
Team Record: 22-60 (28th)
Eastern Conference Standing: 14th
Team Wins Produced: 23.3 (27th)
Point Differential: -6.28 (27th)
Even the brief numbers aren't pretty; in a little bit I'll take a deeper look at the team numbers, but for now let's just take a quick look. The Raptors finished with the 3rd-worst record in the league (2nd-worst in the East), behind only Cleveland and Minnesota. In terms of Wins Produced and point differential - both better indicators of team quality than Win-Loss record - the Raps finished with the 4th-worst numbers in the league.
Certainly not very happy numbers. And actually, even worse than the paltry amount of wins I predicted that the team would end up with (which was 28 wins). What happened to the Raptors this season? Well, it would make sense if I compared what I thought would happen against what actually happened.
Sunday, April 24, 2011
2010-11 Raptors Season Review
Labels:
amir johnson,
andrea bargnani,
awards,
barbosa,
bayless,
demar derozan,
dorsey,
ed davis,
james johnson,
jose calderon,
julian wright,
kleiza,
reggie evans,
regular season,
sonny weems
Tuesday, April 12, 2011
Fake Trades: Jazz Edition
New readers, please check out the basics before leaving any comments.
Short post today.
For shits and giggles, I was playing around on the ESPN NBA Trade Machine, which is what happens when your favourite team has been out of the playoff picture since December. Unfortunately, now isn't the best time to be fiddling around with it - as many contracts can't be traded at the moment - but it's still fun.
I was looking at the Jazz as a trading partner for the Raptors. Why? Well, since the Deron Williams trade, it looks like the Jazz are trying to move in a new direction (aka blow it all up). They still have plenty of good players, including some up-and-comers, and thus are ripe for the picking.
Short post today.
For shits and giggles, I was playing around on the ESPN NBA Trade Machine, which is what happens when your favourite team has been out of the playoff picture since December. Unfortunately, now isn't the best time to be fiddling around with it - as many contracts can't be traded at the moment - but it's still fun.
I was looking at the Jazz as a trading partner for the Raptors. Why? Well, since the Deron Williams trade, it looks like the Jazz are trying to move in a new direction (aka blow it all up). They still have plenty of good players, including some up-and-comers, and thus are ripe for the picking.
Labels:
andrea bargnani,
bad players,
fake trades,
GMs,
good players,
jazz,
Raptors
Thursday, April 7, 2011
NBA Today and rebuilding the Raptors
New readers, please check out the basics before leaving any comments.
Mosi Platt of the Miami Heat Index sent me a link to a recent NBA Today podcast where (starting at around the 27th minute) Ryen Russillo talks about how to rebuild the Raptors. Mosi wanted to hear my thoughts on Russillo's comments about the Raptors, and so I sent him a quick email reply.
I've expanded on my brief thoughts below. Each of my comments is made in response to something that Ryen Russillo said on the podcast; Russillo's comments are italicized.
Mosi Platt of the Miami Heat Index sent me a link to a recent NBA Today podcast where (starting at around the 27th minute) Ryen Russillo talks about how to rebuild the Raptors. Mosi wanted to hear my thoughts on Russillo's comments about the Raptors, and so I sent him a quick email reply.
I've expanded on my brief thoughts below. Each of my comments is made in response to something that Ryen Russillo said on the podcast; Russillo's comments are italicized.
Labels:
amir johnson,
andrea bargnani,
canada,
colangelo,
ESPN,
greg oden,
jay triano,
jose calderon,
miami heat index,
nash,
nba today,
podcast,
Raptors,
usa
Saturday, April 2, 2011
The Regend and the Ninja: A Response (part II)
New readers, please check out the basics before leaving any comments.
On Saturday, Tom Liston of Raptors Republic - TrueHoop's Raptors' affiliate - wrote a column about Reggie Evans and James Johnson. In his column, Tom mentions that he has some problems with Wins Produced and my analysis of Evans and Johnson in the past. Specifically, Tom's main issues seem to be:
The other day I responded to these first two points. Today I'm going to tackle the last two.
On Saturday, Tom Liston of Raptors Republic - TrueHoop's Raptors' affiliate - wrote a column about Reggie Evans and James Johnson. In his column, Tom mentions that he has some problems with Wins Produced and my analysis of Evans and Johnson in the past. Specifically, Tom's main issues seem to be:
- Evans' WP48 is near the top of the league (currently at 0.356), but Reggie doesn't seem to belong with the other players (Kevin Love, Dwight Howard, Chris Paul, LeBron James, Dwayne Wade) at the top.
- If Wins Produced doesn't overvalue rebounds, and the only thing Evans' does well is rebound, why is Evans' WP48 so high?
- James Johnson is playing well in Toronto - "he’s pretty much exactly the same player" as he was during his rookie season. So why did I say that he probably wouldn't be a good player when Toronto traded for him?
- Wins Produced is one measure of player productivity among several, and one should "never rely on one metric to draw conclusions".
The other day I responded to these first two points. Today I'm going to tackle the last two.
Labels:
2010-11,
arturo,
bad players,
draft,
good players,
james johnson,
julian wright,
nerd numbers,
Raptors,
raptors republic,
Wins Produced
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)