Showing posts with label 2010 WBC. Show all posts
Showing posts with label 2010 WBC. Show all posts

Thursday, September 23, 2010

2010 FIBA WBC in Turkey: Leandro Barbosa Stats

Here is the spreadsheet for the Brazilian team WBC stats, which includes Leandro Barbosa, as well as fellow NBA players Anderson Varejao and Tiago Splitter:


Let's take a look at Barbosa first:



Not bad, but I think everyone was hoping for a little more against international competition. He was close to average in most categories except for rebounding and steals, which were above average.  His FGAtt were way more than average, which lead to his scoring being way more than average as well - but his shooting efficiency was a tiny bit below average and so his shooting wasn't all that helpful (although he did manage to pass the 1 PPS threshold). He played particularly poorly in Brazil's three losses against USA, Slovenia, and Argentina; in fact, take a look at the difference in Barbosa's production during wins and his production during losses:


Barbosa played incredibly well in victories (Iran, Tunisia, and Croatia) and quite terribly in losses (USA, Slovenia, and Argentina). Compounding this was the fact that he played fewer minutes in wins than in losses, presumably because when his team was ahead they felt that they would rest him, and when his team was behind they thought they 'needed him' to help them win.

Who's that A. Garcia? That would be former Spur (2003-04) and Hornet (2004-05) Alex Garcia. Garcia produced the most wins for the Brazilian team (1.03) and had a EWP40 of 0.256 (third best on the team). He shot more efficiently, rebounded better, turned the ball over less...did better than Barbosa in pretty much every category other than FG attempts and points. Garcia was the best guard on the team.

Now let's take a look at selected forwards and centres:



Machado was the team's best forward and best player overall (by EWP40). Despite putrid rebounding numbers, he scored so much and so efficently that he still managed to produce at an excellent rate. It's a shame that he only played the sixth-most minutes on the team, and as he is 35 years old, his international career is probably near its end.

Varejao, Splitter, and Becker split their time at forward and centre, so comparing their numbers isn't perfectly straightfoward. A couple of things stand out; for example, Varejao couldn't shoot. Interestingly, he seems to have known that because he did not take very many shots of any kind. The main thing he did well (and he did it amazingly well) was rebound; other than that, his low foul and turnover rates were positives, but not much else was. Splitter, on the other hand, was much more balanced; he didn't really stand out in any one area, but instead was slightly above average in most. Both produced at a similar rate - Varejao at an EWP40 of 0.157 and Splitter at 0.149 - but due to Varejao's injuries at the start of the tournament, Splitter player more minutes and so produced more wins.

Becker performed like a better version of Varejao - his main skill was rebounding, but he managed to outperform in every category other than fouls and steals, and was thus significantly more productive. If I was a centre-starved NBA team (*coughRaptorscough*), I'd probably consider giving him a look to see if he could maintain at least a portion of his efficiency in an NBA setting.

So, with all that out of the way, let me add a few more thoughts about the stats from these games:
  • I find it interesting (but not totally surprising) that the three best players on an international team with three NBA players were non-NBA players
  • Brazil kicked Croatia's butt - 1.339 EWins Produced to -0.339 EWins Produced.
  • Brazil actually out-performed Argentina - 0.508 EWP to 0.492 EWP - but still lost a close game.
  • Despite a very close score, the USA was clearly the better team in their game (0.625 EWP to 0.375 EWP)
  • Huge games: Barbosa (0.553 EWP) vs Tunisia and Scola (0.522 EWP) vs Brazil
Lately I haven't been posting as often as I would like - blame it on moving. I hope to get back up to speed in the next little bit.

 - Devin.

Tuesday, September 14, 2010

2010 FIBA WBC in Turkey: Linas Kleiza Stats

After all that work putting together the team Canada stats I didn't really feel like doing any further analysis - even though I started working on the WBC in order to cover former and current Raptors players. However, I thought about it and realized that...I already had most of the work done! All I needed to do was replace all the Canadian stats with other teams' stats (and add a couple of pages...and fiddle with positions...and formatting...). It's still quite a lot of work, especially given that I'm generally only interested in one player on each team, but at least I'm not starting over from scratch.

Let's take a look at Linas Kleiza's numbers from the bronze medal-winning Lithuanian national team:


As you can see, Kleiza did very well over in Turkey. His shooting was efficient and frequent, and as a consequence he scored a lot of points. His rebounding was very good and helped to compensate for his below average performance with respect to steals and TOs. His blocks and assists were slightly below average, but he fouled far less than the average forward. Put it all together and Kleiza had a WP40 of 0.221 and produced 1.56 wins in 281 minutes across 9 games.

If you are interested in the other Lithuanian players or want to see more detailed, game-by-game stats, here's the spreadsheet data:



A couple of things that I found interesting:

  • All of the Lithuanian players produced in the positive range - except for Jonas Maculius, who was barely negative.
  • The four best players on the Lithuanian team (by EWP40) were all front-court players.
  • Kleiza got completely shut down against the US. Take a look at Kleiza's game by game performance:

To make it more obvious, you can also arrange the data like this:

  • Durant killed Lithuania; he produced 0.609 wins by himself that game, which is enough to win the game without any additional production from his teammates. Even worse for Lithuania, USA actually produced more than one win over the course of the game...which means that the whole Lithuanian team produced a negative number of wins. That is what we call an ass-kicking (although not as bad as the ass-kicking Spain gave Canada).
That's it for now - check back in the coming days for more on Leandro Barbosa, David Andersen, and possibly other interesting international players.

 - Devin.

Monday, September 13, 2010

2010 FIBA WBC in Turkey: Wins Produced for Team Canada

Thanks to Mosi over at Miami Heat Index, I have managed to put together the Estimated Wins Produced numbers for all of the players on the Canadian men's national basketball team. These numbers include only the five games played in Turkey (against Lebanon, Lithuania, France, New Zealand, and Spain) and none of the qualifying or exhibitions. Putting everything together was a long process and also taught me about some new excel functions - and I wouldn't have been able to do it without Mosi's help.

First I'll embed the spreadsheets into this post and then follow up with some analysis.



If you are too lazy to look through all those numbers, let me give it to you in summary form. The players can be sorted into three categories: the good, the barely positive, and the negative.


The Good:

Only four players on the Canadian team managed to produce at an above average level (greater than 0.100 EWP40). They are (in order of EWP40): Levon Kendall, Kelly Olynyk, Ryan Bell, and Joel Anthony.










Levon Kendall was not only the most efficient player with a EWP40 of 0.302, he also produced the most wins at 0.907. In fact, Kendall - by himself - was more productive than the entire team...which also includes Kendall. Yes, after Kendall, the rest of the team actually produced a negative number of wins. Despite being below the average forward with respect to all aspects of shooting, he was above average in every other category. Where he excelled was rebounding and net possessions; at 12.7 reb/48 and 12.0 possessions/48, he even crushed the numbers for an average centre. All those extra possessions are very valuable and so boosted his WP40 to a superstar level.

Kelly Olynyk was the second most efficient player on the team with a WP40 of 0.284; unfortunately he was also 8th on the team in minutes played and as a consequence only produced 0.46 wins. Olynyk was productive mainly because of his shooting efficiency, scoring, ability to avoid fouling, and, to a lesser extent, his ability to protect the ball. In all other areas he was below average, but not very much so. So Olynyk was successful mostly due to his scoring skills and not much else.

Ryan Bell was the third most efficient Canadian team member, with a WP40 of 0.255. Unfortunately he played even fewer minutes than Olynyk did, and so only produced 0.340 wins. Bell scored an amazing 1.75 points per shot! That rate is so high, he could've halved it and still had an above average PPS! Unfortunately he only attempted 3.0 shots per 40 minutes - so ridiculously low that it's also the same as his free-throw rate (which is still below average for free-throw attempts). Thus, despite his crazy PPS, he still scored substantially less than an average guard. He also rebounded at a rate slightly below average and was poor at getting assists. Other than that, Bell was above average with respect to steals, TOs, net possessions, blocks, and fouls.

The team's only player with NBA experience, Joel Anthony, was the fourth most productive and last member of the Canadian team who managed to produce at an above average level. He produced at a rate of 0.158 WP40, and because he played the most minutes on the team (149 MP) he produced the second most wins (0.571). Anthony did three things very well: block shots, avoid fouls, and shoot efficiently. He did two things quite poorly: free-throw conversion and rebounding. He was also poor at gaining possessions and getting assists, but not too far away from average.

Together these four players produced 2.277 wins, or 253% of the team's wins, in 38.6% of the team's minutes.


The Barely Positive:

Only two other players managed to produce a positive number of wins for Team Canada during the 2010 WBC. They are (in order of EWP40): Denham Brown and Jermaine Bucknor.















Denham Brown was not very productive, but at least he managed to produce in the posivitve range. He scored at an above average rate, but was not very efficient while doing so. Other than that, in every other area, with the exception of TOs and fouls, Brown was below average. Because he played the 4th most minutes on the team, he managed to produce 0.081 wins.

Jermaine Bucknor was slightly less efficient than Brown, posting a WP40 of 0.027. He shot very efficiently, but did not take very many field goal attempts, keeping his scoring below average. Other than his steals and TOs, everything else was below average, particularly rebounds and fouls. He ended up 7th on the team in minutes and produced 0.023 wins.

Together these two players produced 11.5% of the team's wins in 18.6% of the team's minutes.


The Negative:

The remaining six players produced in the negative range. They are (in order of EWP40): Jermaine Anderson, Robert Sacre, Andy Rautins, Aaron Doornekamp, Jevohn Shepherd, and Olu Famutimi.









Jermaine Anderson just missed being a positive producer of wins. His assists, steals, and FT attempts were all slightly above average, but other than that everything was below average. Especially poor was his AdjFG%. Anderson somehow managed to play the second most minutes on the team, and in that time he produced -0.026 wins.

Robert Sacre was the backup centre (behind Anthony) on the team. His steals, rebounds, FT%, and net possessions were above average; unfortunately everything else was below average (with the exception of FG attempts...and at his PPS, this actually hurt his numbers), particularly his PPS and PFs. In 44 minutes, Sacre managed to produce -0.123 wins.

Andy Rautins was injured and did not play well. His scoring and rebounding numbers were the only areas that were above average; particularly poor were his net possessions and (especially) his PFs. In 39 minutes across three games, Rautins produced -0.153 wins.

Aaron Doornekamp also played while injured, and like Rautins, did not play well in that time. His poor shooting and rebounding really hurt his productivity, but he managed to be above average wit hrespect to steals, TOs, and assists. Rautins was 5th on the team in minutes played and produced -0.464 wins.

Jevohn Shepherd accumulated steals, avoided TOs, and shot free-throws at above average rates. Unfortunately he couldn't shoot (0.69 PPS) and rebounded worse than the average guard (3.6 reb/40). Everything else was also below average, but his shooting efficiency and rebounding were what hurt him the most. He played the 6th most minutes, and in that time, produced -0.512 wins.

Olu Famutimi played very limited minutes over the course of two games, which is very fortunate, because he didn't manage to perform at an above average level in any category. In his limited time he somehow managed to produce -0.203 wins.

Together these four players produced -165% of the team's wins in 42.8% of the team's minutes.


Overall Team Performance

The fact that the four worst-performing players on the team managed to play 42.8% of the team's minutes suggests there were a few errors in player management. In fact, if the minutes were divided amongst the players by productivity, the team would've produced 2.43 wins instead of 0.900.














What's interesting is that the top 5 players consist of two forwards, two guards, and one centre, and the top 3 off the bench are a forward, a guard, and a centre. Of course, it's easy to say which players should've played the most minutes after the fact. The coaches of the team had the very difficult task of dealing with determining minutes on the fly, often with limited sample sizes (that is...if they used stats to determine minutes). In any case, this tournament should provide some good data going forward - and the good news is that the oldest member of the team is 28 year old Joel Anthony. If the coaches can fine tune their minute allocations, this team could be more successful in future (look out for Kelly Olynyk in the years to come).

 - Devin.